Friday, December 16, 2016

The Existing Directed-Energy Arsenal (1992)


   The Existing Directed-Energy Arsenal  







   by, Julianne McKinney  Director, Electronic Surveillance Project  Association of National Security Alumni  December 1992

   Whither the KGB?

    In February 1974, Georgetown University's Center for Strategic and  International Studies (CSIS) hosted discussions on the plight of  dissenters in the Soviet Union, and on a means by which the U.S.  Government might most effectively intervene. highlights of these  discussions are reported in "Understanding the Solzhenitzyn Affair:  Dissent and its Control in the USSR," (CSIS, 1974).   KGB strategies were addressed in some detail during these  discussions. It was noted that the KGB's success depended on the  extensive use of informant networks and agent provocateurs; and,  following Brezhnev's rise to power, on the use of drugs and  psychiatrists for further purpose of manipulation and control.  Shadowing, bugging, slandering, blacklisting and other related  tactics were also cited as serving KGB purpose. Participants in  the conference agreed that the KGB's obvious intent was to divide  and isolate the populace, to spread fear, and to silent dissenters.   Agencies of our own government are on record as having employed  precisely these same tactics on a recurrent basis. The Church and  Rockefeller Committee Hearings in the mid-70's purportedly put an  end to these practices. Based on recent developments, it would  appear that the CIA's and FBI's Operations MKULTRA, MHCHAOS and  COINTELPRO (the focus of these Senate Committee and Vice-President-  level Hearings) were instead merely driven underground. We are now  in contact with a total of 25 individuals, scattered throughout the  United states, who firmly believe they are being harassed by  agencies of the U.S. Government. Others have been brought to our  attention whom we will be contacting in the future. The majority  of these individuals claim that their harassment and surveillance  began in 1989.   The methods reportedly employed in these harassment campaigns bear  a striking resemblance to those attributed to the CIA and FBI  during Operations MKULTRA, MHCHAOS and COINTELPRO. The only  difference now is that electronic harassment and experimentation  also appear to be (more blatantly) involved.   The Berlin Wall is down, Communism is in the midst of a death  rattle, and the KGB no longer poses the threat which purportedly  served to justify the U.S. Government's resort to such operations  as MKULTRA, MHCHAOS and COINTELPRO. The KGB, since 1989, has been  reduced to an increasingly distant memory.   Reactivation of surveillance/harassment/mind-control operations in  this country suggest that the KGB, as an institution, was never the  real threat. A KGB "mentality," which is underlying pragmatic  contempt for civil liberties, appears, instead, to have been the  driving force behind MKULTRA, MHCHAOS and COINTELPRO, and the  operations now being reported to us.   The KGB "mentality" is a matter of personal predilection, not  ideology. Its objective is power and control, regardless of human  cost. It is a corrupting, cancerous influence, which feeds on  fear, conformity and government funding.   Four months ago, when this Project commenced, we approached these  complaints of government harassment and experimentation with an  admitted "high degree of caution." We are no longer skeptical.  The growing numbers of independent complaints and the similarities  between those complaints cannot be ignored. Under the  circumstances, the KGB should be proud of itself. As a  "mentality," the KGB appears to be accomplishing more in "burying  this country" from within, than it could ever have hoped to have  achieved as an institution. It would appear that this country has  a serious problem on its hands which needs to be resolved.   Part I of this report, which is reprinted from the June-July  edition of the association's publication, Unclassified,  preliminarily addresses the complaints brought to our attention as  of July 1992. Our objective, as noted, was to weigh the legitimacy  of those complaints in terms of the directed-energy technologies  reportedly involved. Part II discusses the overt and covert  patterns of harassment identified as a result of our  investigations, to date. A part of our objective, here, is to  limit the success of such operations in the future, by according  them widespread publicity.   In Part II, we do not identify individuals by name, both to honor  their privacy and because our investigations have not been  completed. Part II, like Part I, is a preliminary finding. Our  focus is on the similarities of the complaints being received --  similarities which Federal and State legislators, the courts, the  FBI, local law enforcement agencies, the medical and psychiatric  professions, and organizations such as the ACLU and Amnesty  International have so far chosen to ignore.   We frankly find it curious that more attention and creditability is  being accorded purported victims of UFO experiences and spectral  visitations, than to persons who complain of systematic harassment  and experimentation by the U.S. Government, involving technologies  which the U.S. Government is only now grudgingly admitting to  possess. These complaints require investigation. In due course  (and provided financial support is obtained), we hope to be able to  acquire the technology and supportive medical expertise to  substantiate the claims being made. We also hope to alter the  institutional mindset that U.S. Intelligence can be trusted.  History, repeatedly, has proven otherwise.   ??   ??   PART 1 - THE PROBLEM SURFACES   [Reprinted from the June-July 1992 edition of UNCLASSIFIED (Vol.  IV, No. 3), published by The Association of National Security  Alumni, Washington, D.C.]   The August-September 1991 issue of UNCLASSIFIED reviewed Hamline  University's "Public Administration" report on the resolution of  MKULTRA cases in 1988. Although the shocking details of medical  ethics abuses by the U.S. and Canadian governments were amply  detailed, Washington and Ottawa -- citing national security and  government privilege -- stalled for so long that cases never came  to trial. the surviving victims settled for a pittance in an out-  of-court settlement.   Since no individuals or agencies were held legally accountable, the  door was left open for possible resumption of similar "mind-  control" activities.   In the context of that article, we mentioned briefly that some  half-dozen people had contacted us with appeals for assistance in  ending what they believe to be electronic harassment and mind-  control experimentation, possibly involving the CIA. We decided to  take a closer look at the situation.   We are now in touch with approximately a dozen individuals  throughout the United States who appear to be targets of harassment  and mind-control experimentation involving directed-energy  technologies. [By mid-November 1992, the number had increased to  25.]   Typically, persons who complain of being "zapped by radio waves"  and of "hearing voices" are stigmatized as psychotic, delusional or  schizophrenic. Being mindful of this, as well as aware of the  treatment accorded UFO and psychic phenomena "freaks," we approach  this subject with a high degree of caution. Based on our  preliminary investigation, including interviews with the affected  individuals, we conclude that the matter is serious and should be  pursued further.   ??   ??   The Existing Directed-Energy Arsenal   Our first step was to determine what, if any technology exists  which might be used for electronic harassment. The information was  found in a "white paper" published in 1991 by the U.S. Global  Strategy Council -- a Washington-based organization, under the  chairmanship of Ray Cline, former Deputy Director of the CIA, who  maintains very close ties with the U.S. Intelligence community.  The "white paper" describes the foreign and domestic uses foreseen  for laser weapons, isotropic radiators, infrasound, non-nuclear  electromagnetic pulse generators, and high-powered microwave  emitters.   The term, "non-lethal," used to describe this technology is  misleading. the energy emitted from all of these weapons can kill  people when appropriately amplified. At lower levels of amplified,  they can cause extreme forms of physical discomfort and  debilitation.   The Department of the Army (DA) identifies these same weapons as  "non-conventional." They were so identified in an exhibit at a DA-  sponsored symposium on "The Soldier As A System," in Crystal City,  VA, on June 30, 1992. Beta wave incapacitators were separately  mentioned during the symposium as being particular interested to  the U.S. Marine Corps.   We discussed these "non-conventional" directed-energy weapons with  Mr. Vernon Shisler, manager of the exhibit and the Army's delegate  to NATO in matters pertaining to "The Soldier As A System." Mr.  Shisler acknowledged not only that directed-energy weapons are in  the Dod's arsenal, but also that the American soldier will remain  vulnerable to their effects, should they be employed in the  battlefield.   The U.S. Global Strategy Council recognizes the issue of  vulnerability, as well, and urges ongoing research into effective  countermeasures.   Interested readers may want to send for the U.S. Global Strategy  Council's complete project proposal on this subject: (Title:  Nonlethality: Development of a National Policy and Employing  Nonlethal Means in a New Strategic Era, prepared by Janet Morris).  A number of references in this Proposal to unidentified, elusive  "enemies" of the U.S. Government and the potential domestic  applications of this "non-lethal" technology invite serious  consideration by the public at large.   The Council's address is 1800 K Street, N.W., Washington, D.C.  20006, (202) 466-6029.   ??   ??   BIOEFFECTS OF MICROWAVE RADIATION   Research into biological and psychological effects of exposure to  microwave radiation is voluminous. The U.S. public has been led to  believe that the former Soviet Union leads in this research. The  fact is, the CIA and DoD [Department of Defense] have jointly  pursued precisely the same research since commencement of Project  Pandora in the 1950's. The current primary users of this research  appear to be the CIA, DoD, the National Security Agency (NSA) and  the Department of Energy (DoE).   The Walter Reed Army Institute of Research (WRAIR) has participated  in this research since Project Pandora. In 1973, WRAIR discovered  that externally-induced auditory input could be achieved by means  of pulsed microwave audiograms, or analogs of spoken words' sounds.  The effect on the receiving end is the (schizophrenic) sensation of  "hearing voices" which are no part of the recipients' own thought  processes.   The experiment prompted the following comment in "The Body  Electric: Electromagnetism and the Foundation of Life," by Robert  O. Becker, M.D., and Gary Selden (Wm. Morrow & Company, NY, 1985):  "Such a device has obvious applications in covert operations  designed to drive a target crazy with 'voices' or deliver  undetected instructions to a programmed assassin."   This research has continued, and the results are published in  various publicly available scientific and technical journals.  Interested readers might consult, for example: Lin, James C.,  Electromagnetic Interaction With Biological Systems (Plenum Press,  NY, 1989). Professor Lin, then with the Department of  Bioengineering, University of Illinois, Chicago, has published a  number of books and articles on this subject. [He has more recently  informed us that he had designed the experiment referred above in  Dr. Becker's book.]   WRAIR has more recently been studying the biological effects of  exposure to high power microwave radiation. WRAIR presented a  paper on this subject to a DoD-sponsored symposium on "MW  [microwave] Weapons" at the Naval Postgraduate School in Monterey,  CA, in mid-1989.   A matter of interest to us is why WRAIR should be experimenting  with auditory effects of pulsed microwave audiograms. Also, recent  statements by an Army psychiatrist assigned to the Walter Reed Army  Medical Center (WRAMC) suggest that WRAIR may be experimenting upon  select psychiatric inpatients with microwaves. This, too, is a  matter to us.   ??   ??   CONGRESSIONAL OVERSIGHT   The Government's past record of abuses in the area of civil rights  is well documented. Within the past 30 years alone, we have  witnessed the effects of Operations MKULTRA, MHCHAOS and  COINTELPRO.   Primarily because of MKULTRA, MHCHAOS and COINTELPRO, Executive  Orders and implementing regulations were published which prohibited  military and CIA domestic covert intelligence operations.  Experiments on involuntary human subjects, and the surveillance  of/collection of personal information on U.S. citizens, except  under strictly regulated conditions were also prohibited.   Congressional committees were created to oversee compliance with  these (quasi-) legal prohibitions. We have evidence that this is  not being done. Moreover, where there are laws and, in this case,  no laws enacted, there are loopholes, as well as individual and  institutions who deliberately capitalize upon the existence of  loopholes. Iran-Contra is one of the more blatant recent examples.  Loopholes are also found in government resort to "black"  intelligence and weapons programs, in the use of contractors, and in  the absence of clear definitions of such terms as "national  security" and "national security risk."   Executive Orders and regulations which currently limit U.S.  Intelligence activities do not extend to non-intelligence  government agencies or to their contractors. If fact, Executive  Order 12333 specifies that government contractors do not need to  know that their services support U.S. Intelligence objectives.   In its report of July 8, 1992, the Senate Subcommittee on Oversight  of Government Management addresses the problem of tracking funds  granted to government-contracted research and development (R&D)  centers. The report notes that the problem is compounded by DoD's  penchant for creating hard-to-monitor "shell" contractors as  disbursement centers for funding programs.   Neither shell contractors nor their subcontractors are directly  accountable to Congress. Being beyond Congressional oversight,  they have the license to operate as Government surrogates in  intelligence operations about which, "officially" they know  nothing.   In this context, a publication disseminated at DA's "The Soldier As  A System" symposium noted that the Army's Research and Technology  Program sponsors 42 laboratories and R & D centers, employing  approximately 10,000 scientists and engineers. The annual budget  of $1.3 billion is only a small part of overall DoD research  spending.   Weapons research, which includes the development and testing of  "non-lethal" weapons, is not governed by laws restricting the  activities of U.S. Intelligence agencies, though it may be presumed  that these agencies contribute to and benefit from such research.   ??   ??   PRELIMINARY FINDINGS    1. The technology exists for the types of harassment and  experimentation reported to us.   2. About a dozen U.S. citizens have informed us of continuing  experiments with effects which directed-energy weapons are  designed to produce.   3. U.S. Government-sponsored research into the bioeffects of  exposure to microwave radiation is extensive and  continuing.   4. The U.S. Government has a past record of having engaged in  mind-control experimentation; and various agencies of the  Government have a record of circumventing legal  restrictions upon their activities.   5. Neither Congress nor the courts appear willing to look  closely into "black" intelligence and weapons procurement  programs.   6. A number of U.S. Government agencies might have interest  in testing directed-energy technologies on U.S. citizens  under non-clinical/non-controlled circumstances -- DoD, to  test ranges and degrees of "non-lethality"; DoE, to  explore "safety" limits; CIA, to test "mind-control"  capabilities, and NSA, for technological refinement.   ??   ??   PART II -- OVERT AND COVERT HARASSMENT   Since publication of the preceding article less than four months  ago, the association of National Security Alumni/Electronic  Surveillance Project has heard from an additional 13 individuals  who report both overt harassment and a range of symptoms which  coincide with the known effects of exposure to microwaves,  electromagnetic/radio frequency (RF) radiation and/or infrasound.   The similarity of these symptoms will be addressed in greater  detail in future Project reports. Suffice it to say, at this point,  that the physical and psychological symptoms being reported to us  are consistent with the effects which directed-energy weapons are  designed to produce. Indeed, the numerous afflictions (or  "inflictions") being reported appear to parallel standard torture  "sequelae,"(1) (aftereffects).   ??   ??   OVERT HARASSMENT   Overt Harassment -- which obviously is meant to be observed -- may  be intended to "precondition" individuals for eventual long-term  electronic harassment. Persons terrified by unexplained overt  harassment are not likely to cope with the sudden onset of  electronic harassment in any more reasoned fashion. This phased  pattern of harassment is apparent in all of the cases now being  investigated. The fact that the overt harassment continues in  these cases even after the electronic targeting commences suggest  that the objective is to maintain long-term extremes of stress.   Many of the overt harassment tactics discussed below are surfacing  in cases which (so far) have not involved discernible forms of  electronic harassment. These are cases involving so-called  "whistleblowers" who, because of their inside knowledge of certain  potentially newsworthy events, pose particular threats of  embarrassment to the Government or to government-affiliated  employers. We have noticed that electronic harassment is beginning  to surface as a form of retaliation against persons who try to  assist electronic "harassees." Retaliation suggest loss of  control. Under these circumstances, we are not entirely confident  that "whistleblowers" will continue to be exempted from this type  of harassment in the long term.   The individuals now in touch with the Project describe their  circumstances as involving most, if not all, of the following overt  forms of harassment:   * Sudden, bizarrely-rude treatment, isolation and acts of  harassment and vandalism by formerly friendly neighbors.   * Harassing telephone calls, which continue even after the  targeted individual obtains new, unlisted telephone  numbers.   * Mail interception, theft and tampering.   * Noise campaigns.   While unrelenting harassing telephone calls might be considered in  this context, other tactics are employed. Blaring horns, whistles,  sirens, garbage disposal (run concurrently in apartment settings,  for excessively prolonged periods of time), and amplified  transmissions of recorded "general racket" have been used on a  recurrent basis under circumstances intended to persuade the  individual that he or she is under surveillance.   In all of these cases, the individuals' neighbors apparently  pretend to be oblivious and/or indifferent to these sudden,  continuous explosions of noise.   Door slamming is also a popular pastime, particularly in apartment  buildings. One individual reported that, during a peak period of  harassment, the neighbor across the hall began entering and leaving  his apartment every 10 minutes, slamming his door loudly on each  occasion. This was a daily occurrence, encompassing periods of  several hours, over a period of several months. It is apparently  served to trigger a door-slamming "chain reaction" on the part of  neighbors both on that floor and on the floors immediately above  and below. When our contact politely asked her immediate neighbor  to close her door more quietly, he slammed the door in her face.  Prior to commencement of this harassment, the neighbor had  apparently been quite friendly and courteous.   In another case, the primary door-slammer is an employee of Radix  Systems, Inc., Rockville, MD, a DoD contractor engaged in the  "super-secret" research and development of some type of electronic  equipment.   Several individuals reported recurrent, loud, strange noises in  their ventilation systems during the preliminary stages of their  harassment. One individual complained of being recurrently  awakened in the middle of the night by the sound of wires being fed  into his (independent) ventilation system. On checking further, he  found that a tubular construction had been built into his vent  system which appears to lead to the apartment upstairs. His  upstairs neighbor is employed by the Department of Justice.   A number of individuals report that occupants of upstairs and  downstairs apartments appear to follow them from room to room,  tapping on the floor or engaging in other activities which appear  intended to advertise an ongoing surveillance.   The Justice Department employee mentioned above went as far as to  offer an unsolicited apology to her downstairs neighbor for an all-  night "pacing about" in her bedroom (in the event he had happened  to notice it). She claimed to be an insomniac. The pacing-about  continued during her recent 36-hour absence from the area. When  her contact politely alerted her to the fact that her apartment had  apparently been entered during her absence, she told him, in  effect, to mind his own business and then immediately complained to  the building manager that he was stalking her.   She conveniently forgot to inform the building manager that she had  assiduously "courted" this individual for several months, without  success; and that she had been stealing his newspapers on a regular  basis. (On one occasion, she handed him a week's accumulation of  those papers, claiming that they had been left outside the door of  another apartment. Her reason for collecting and saving the  newspapers which had not been delivered to her directly is  unknown.)   * Recurrent confrontations by unusually hostile strangers;  and comments by strangers which appear intended to evoke  "paranoid" reactions.   In this context, we note that several individuals have reported  confrontations with "homeless" people who, on closer examination,  were found to be fastidiously clean, though garbed in offbeat  fashion (wigs included). The same "eccentric" confronted two of  the individuals in contact with us, at separate distant locations.  He is reported as having feigned mental illness on both occasions,  and as having apparently enjoyed creating a public scene.   * Entries into the individual's residence, during late-night  hours while he/she is sleeping, and/or during the day when  the individual is elsewhere.   In virtually all such cases, the burglars leave evidence of their  visits, such as relocating objects, or by committing petty and not-  so=petty acts of vandalism. In two cases, the burglar's "calling  card" was to slaughter caged pets, leaving the mangled carcasses  inside their locked cages.   In one case, the burglar stole several pieces of correspondence and  left a packet of crack cocaine behind as a "calling card." Our  contact in this case -- an individual who has no criminal record  and no history of experimentation with drugs -- is also being  harassed (stalked) by a police officer of her community. One of  his recent acts was to "frame" her with a drug possession charge.  After pulling her off the road (a frequent pastime) and subjecting  her to an illegal search (done, twice, so far), he conveniently  managed to find a glassine packet of cocaine eight feet away, in  front of his squad car. He retrieved the packet with his fingers  and then charged her with Possession. Our contact found the packet  of crack cocaine in her apartment shortly after this investigator  reminded the attorney handling her case that the police officer had  smudged his only piece of evidence with his own fingerprints. It  would appear that someone is interested in correcting that police  officer's oversight.   In another case, the individual reports that a tremendous amount of  money has been stolen from a hiding place in her apartment, within  hours after she had withdrawn the money from her bank. There was  no obvious signs of entry into her apartment. The police conducted  a cursory inquiry which failed to produce evidence of a crime  worthy of investigation. (This case is an anomaly. Money is  usually not stolen. Documents appear to be the preferred objects  of theft, when theft occur.)   In another case, the burglars replaced installed lightbulbs with  "exploding" bulbs, many of which were 'Made in Hungary.' The  lightbulbs are now in our possession.   * Rapidly deteriorating health, generally of a digestive  nature.   In two cases of the cases reported, massive rectal bleeding  accompanied the sudden onset of sever gastrointestinal  disturbances. One of these individuals abruptly terminated the  deteriorative process simply by changing the locks on her door.   * Sleep disruption/deprivation   This is achieved by means of overt and electronic harassment.  Sleep deprivation, as a tactic, invariably surfaces when the  targeted individual begins exhibiting a strong emotional and  irrational response to the other forms of harassment.   * Vandalism of privately-owned vehicles   Vehicles invite peculiarly ferocious attacks in these harassment  campaigns -- slashed tires, smashed windows, oil drainage, oil  contamination, destruction of electronic components and batteries  (frequently involving wildly fluctuating, grounded fuel gages,  often within range of weapons research facilities and/or other  microwave emitters); and suddenly failed brakes and clutches  (possible involving anti-traction polymers, which are also in DoD's  "non-lethal" weapons arsenal). Recurrent auto thefts have also  been reported.   Two individuals reported finding their oil contaminated immediately  after having the oil changed by reputable mechanics. In one of  these cases, the oil viscosified (thickened) while the individual  was driving through a remote rural area. Her car ground to a halt.  Getting the "gunk" cleaned out of her engine proved to be an  expensive ordeal. (Viscosification agents are also lauded by the  U.S. Global Strategy Council as serving "non-lethal" strategic  purposes -- a topic discussed in Part I of this publication. Had  this woman been assaulted while awaiting help in the said isolated  area, the "non-lethal" attributes of viscosfication agents might  have required redefinition.)   Most of those who have experienced these attacks on a recurring  basis have abandoned driving all together -- an objective  apparently sought by their tormentors as a means of increasing  their isolation.   * Staged accidents. (In kgb lingo: Street Theatre--recruited at  churches--bikers---b.)   The majority of those in touch with us have reported these types of  experiences. One individual, for example, was tailgated at a high  rate of speed by two vehicles, while concurrently being threatened  with a gun by one of the vehicles' occupants. Two others narrowly  avoided what happened to be deliberately attempted collisions by  drivers who quickly sped away from the scene. One avoided three  attempts in four days at being run off the road. One survived by  being run off the road in two incidents within a one-week period,  which resulted in "totaling" of her two vehicles. Another narrowly  avoided being crushed into an expressway retaining wall, on four  occasions, by an off-duty metro bus, as well as, within the same  time frame, being "fried" by two suddenly-malfunctioned household  appliances which subsequently repaired themselves. It should be  noted that, in some of these cases, "accidental" deaths do occur.  One individual in contact with us reported that his mother drove  off a cliff to her death, during a period when he was researching  evidence that a still-respected, high level State Department  official had passed A-bomb secrets to the Soviet Government during  World War II. The accident occurred shortly after her car had  undergone routine maintenance. She was returning from a dental  appointment when the accident occurred. Witnesses state that it  appeared that she had suddenly stepped on the accelerator before  running off the road. The accident served to terminate this  person's research project.   We also look into the recent death of a woman in Lexington, MO, who  was killed when the brakes on her tractor failed. We are informed  that she had been collecting affidavits from persons who believe  they are the targets of government harassment and experimentation  when her "accident" occurred. We are also informed that these  affidavits have disappeared.   Suicides might also qualify as "staged accidents,"particularly  where "plausibly deniable" government involvement has been  surfaced. We are currently looking into the recent suicide of a  man in Trappe, PA, who, as early as 1981, had asked the FBI and CIA  to intervene in his case. We have copies of that early  correspondence. The man, a former U.S. Army radar technician, had  a highly technical and -- given date of his correspondence --  "precocious" grasp of the experimental objectives apparently being  sought in his case. It is apparent from his correspondence that he  had wanted to believe that the Soviets were conducting these  experiments. The FBI and CIA, of course, did not intervene. We  are informed that members of his family have also been targets of  this experimentation.   * Isolation of the individual from members of his/her family  -- virtually assured when highly focused forms of  electronic harassment commence.   The exception to this is when elderly parents and young children in  the family become targets for apparent purposes of intimidation.  This situation has been reported in eight of our cases, to date.   One individual (driven to extremes of stress by ongoing electronic  harassment focusing on her children) killed one child in an effort  to protect her from further pain.(2) It appears that lasers were  being used in this individual's case. The targeting intensified  after she called the Soviet Embassy to report the harassment, which  she believed to be U.S. Government-sponsored. It became even more  deadly when, in a further show of defiance, she then called the  representative of the Iraqi Government to portray the U.S.  Government's war in the Middle East as "hypocritical." She is now  hospitalized in a midwestern facility, where, apparently, the  experimentation is now continuing.   (That psychiatric facility is in a State where a disproportionate  number of complaints of electronic harassment...  add your comments LATEST COMMENTS ABOUT THIS ARTICLE Listed below are the 10 latest comments posted about this article. These comments are anonymously submitted by SF-IMC website visitors. TITLE    AUTHOR    DATE they're right here    Jethro    Sunday January 04, 2004 at 10:33 PM The KGB hasn't "retired"; they're working in the USA    MaryK Croft    Tuesday December 30, 2003 at 05:23 PM(c) Independent Media Center. All content is free for reprint and rebroadcast, on the net and elsewhere, for non-commercial use, unless otherwise noted by author. 

No comments: